Gender speaks to the existence of people as males and
females, masculine and feminine. It is
one of the most important factors in human relationships. Unfortunately, our culture has long been
confused over gender. One news magazine
in recent years even declared on its cover:
“Men and Women Really Are Different.”
That would seem obvious. The
reason why they felt the need to say it is a matter of history.
The Battle of the Sexes
It is an unfortunate
truth that in many cultures throughout human history women have been devalued
and even mistreated. Our own country has
a long tradition of addressing this undeniably legitimate complaint by
women. Among other advances, it won them
the right to vote. “Feminism” is the movement
based on this complaint.
While few would deny
that the basic cause or complaint of feminism is just, some solutions to the
basic problem have been failures.
Especially, what has been called “gender feminism.” Gender feminists demand that gender should
have nothing to do with human relationships.
Especially they demand that all gender specific roles, like that of a
husband being different from a wife, or of a father being different from a
mother, should be thrown out. The idea
that men or women are better suited to certain roles, in this perspective, is
called “sexism.”
Archetypes and Stereotypes
How do people become what they are? Where does personality come from? In part, we are born with certain fixed
characteristics—archetypes. We all
contain an element of ego, of concern for self, that owes itself to nothing
more than meeting the challenges of survival.
Other characteristics are learned, passed on to emerging people from
significant others or from the parent culture.
Gender feminism assumes that all gender traits are stereotypes, that
gender starts with learning. Moreover,
it holds that what our culture traditionally has taught about gender has been
developed by men as a way to disadvantage and abuse women. Reflexively, any and every gender stereotype
is challenged, resisted and overthrown everywhere possible.
Gender feminism has
greatly influenced modern culture. It
has confused marital roles (husbands and wives), parental roles (fathers and
mothers), and especially gender as it relates to roles of authority in society
and in the church. Mothers were
encouraged to enter the traditionally male work place, perhaps even when it
meant abandoning the womanly nurture of children (motherhood). The husbands who left the workplace to
attempt this mothering were called “Mr. Mom.”
All such roles involved stereotypes that, it was thought, should be
thrown off and gender relations should be relearned. Notice that the idea that gender can be
learned or unlearned has made homosexuality the step-child of gender feminism. Formerly, it was understood that males were
to select females as mates. But once
gender was seen as an arbitrary stereotype, the choice of a mate also became
arbitrary. Some even try to change their
physical gender through surgery. Great
effort was placed in reproductive medicine (birth control, abortion, etc.) to
reduce or eliminate the role of gender in relationships.
It is not to be
denied that some gender stereotypes are unnecessary, downright silly, and
perhaps even served to disadvantage one gender before another. Yet it must be admitted that even some of
these were willing disadvantages, in which one gender willingly disadvantaged
itself before the other as a gracious gesture.
For example, a woman would honor her husband by taking his name in
marriage. Or a husband would open doors,
or show other courtesies for his wife. Making such concessions promoted the greater
good of neither the male nor the female; this was for the good of their union
as a couple.
However, it cannot be
denied that gender feminism has confused archetypes with stereotypes. There are certain aspects of maleness and
femaleness that are built-in—they cannot be denied without damage to self,
relationships and society. Gender
feminism denies the undeniable, leading again to the breaking news story: “Men and Women Really Are Different.” Studies in human infants, before they can be
tainted in any way by cultural imprinting of gender traits, show gender
distinctiveness between baby girls and baby boys. Attempts to imprint maleness on girls or to
imprint femininity on boys diminishes rather than exalts essential personhood,
and shows itself as a cruel enterprise.
Gender traits that
are archetypes involve much more than the genital and reproductive organs. Science has identified many aspects of
biology and physiology that show differences between men and women—brain
structure, hormones, etc. There are ways
of socializing that are uniquely male or female. Many books have been written in recent years
that draw conclusions which modern feminism would eagerly reject even when the
evidence goes against its dogmatic contentions.
Each gender is thus better suited to certain roles or functions. The general truth of these distinctions is
not to be denied, even if we admit a great deal of commonality in a shared
humanity between men and women. These
are one species; not two (the differences are so stark as to allow John Gray to
title his bestseller, Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus). And, the general truth is valid also even if we
acknowledge that some men are more “manly” than others and that some women are
more “womanly” than others. While the
magnitude of gender uniqueness varies between individual men and individual
women, the fundamental distinction between male gender and female gender will
still be there at the end of the day, a factor that stubbornly resists denial.
While it might be
wise, in some instances, to challenge gender stereotypes, it is foolish to defy
aspects of gender that are built-in and are fundamental to our humanity. We may even find them a cause for celebration.
No comments:
Post a Comment